rowid,narrative,desc,web_siteName,kind,hash_id,web_inspectionDate,code,repeat,pdf_insp_type,pdf_animals_total,web_certType,pdf_customer_id,pdf_customer_name,pdf_customer_addr,customer_state,pdf_site_id,doccloud_url,lat,lng
92,"The principal investigator did not provide a complete written narrative description of the methods and sources used
to consider alternatives to all procedures that may cause more than momentary or slight pain or distress to the
animals in Protocols SW13M393, SW14M181, and RB14M79. In protocol RB14M79 the method chosen was
""considered to be a classic method"" and no alternatives were discussed despite their existence. The methods must
be clearly shown to be sufficient and identified alternatives must be discussed to assure the IACUC has the
information needed to assure the welfare of the animals. Correct: This point forward
An exit interview was conducted with facility representatives and the IACUC Chair.
Additional Inspectors
Mcfadden Gloria, Veterinary Medical Officer",INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC).,"JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE",,d0cd70b58b206ce3,2014-08-20,2.31(d)(1)(2),0,ROUTINE INSPECTION,574.0,Class R - Research Facility,81.0,The Johns Hopkins University,"265 Garland Hall
3400 N Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218",MD,003,https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23470585-aphis-inspection-232141153270536,39.3273434,-76.62155039999999